Reference Guide
Heart Failure, Transplantation & Valvular Disease
End-stage HF, ISHLT guidelines, transplant management, and structural heart
INTERMACS Profiles for Advanced HF
| Profile | Description | Time Frame for MCS |
|---|---|---|
| 1 – Critical Cardiogenic Shock | Hemodynamic instability despite escalating inotropes/MCS | Hours |
| 2 – Progressive Decline | Inotrope-dependent with ongoing deterioration | Days |
| 3 – Stable but Inotrope-Dependent | Hemodynamically stable on inotropes, cannot wean | Weeks |
| 4 – Resting Symptoms | Daily symptoms at rest without inotropes | Weeks to months |
| 5 – Exertion Intolerant | Comfortable at rest, limited activity | Variable |
| 6 – Exertion Limited | Comfortable with modest activity | Variable |
| 7 – Advanced NYHA III | Clinically stable with meaningful activity | Not indicated |
Cardiogenic Shock Algorithm (SCAI Classification)
- Stage A (At Risk): Large MI, prior HF, acute-on-chronic decompensation without hypoperfusion
- Stage B (Beginning Shock): Relative hypotension, tachycardia, elevated lactate trending up
- Stage C (Classic CS): CI <2.2, PCWP >15, requiring vasopressors/inotropes; lactate >2
- Stage D (Deteriorating): Failing initial interventions, escalating support, multi-organ dysfunction developing
- Stage E (Extremis): Refractory cardiac arrest, PEA/VF, ECPR considered
- Key Principle: Early invasive hemodynamic assessment (PAC) and early MCS consideration before Stage D/E
ISHLT Guidelines (2010, 2024)
- Listing Criteria: Refractory advanced HF (INTERMACS 1–4) despite optimized GDMT, estimated 1-year mortality >20% without transplant
- Absolute Contraindications: Active malignancy, irreversible pulmonary hypertension (PVR >5 WU unresponsive to vasodilators), active systemic infection, severe irreversible end-organ dysfunction
- Preoperative Desensitization: For highly sensitized patients (cPRA >50%), plasmapheresis, IVIg, rituximab, and/or bortezomib protocols per ISHLT 2024
- Donor Selection: Size matching, ischemic time <4h (ideally <6h with ex-vivo perfusion), donor age/comorbidities assessment
Post-Transplant CVICU Management
- Denervated Heart: Resting HR 90–110 bpm; no vagal response. Responds to direct-acting agents (isoproterenol, epinephrine) NOT indirect (atropine ineffective)
- RV Failure (30–50%): Most common cause of early mortality. Manage with iNO, milrinone, epinephrine ± temporary RVAD
- Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD): ISHLT grading. Severe PGD → VA-ECMO as bridge to recovery
- Immunosuppression Induction: Basiliximab or ATG; triple maintenance with tacrolimus, mycophenolate, prednisone
- Rejection Surveillance: Endomyocardial biopsy at protocol intervals; treat cellular rejection per ISHLT grading (≥2R requires pulse steroids)
- Infection Prophylaxis: CMV (valganciclovir), PJP (TMP-SMX), fungal (nystatin/fluconazole), toxoplasmosis in high-risk
Post-Valve Surgery Considerations
| Valve | Key Post-Op Issues | CVICU Priorities |
|---|---|---|
| Aortic (SAVR) | Conduction block (LBBB/CHB 3–10%), bleeding, stroke, prosthetic endocarditis | Temporary pacing wires ready; monitor PR/QRS; anticoagulation per valve type |
| Aortic (TAVR) | New LBBB (15–25%), paravalvular leak, vascular access complications, AKI from contrast | Continuous telemetry ≥48h; assess for PPM need; monitor access site |
| Mitral (repair/replace) | SAM/LVOTO after repair, LV dysfunction, AF, annular dehiscence | TEE confirmation; avoid hypovolemia + vasodilators if SAM suspected |
| MitraClip | Residual MR, pericardial effusion, single-leaflet device attachment | Serial echo; watch for hemodynamic deterioration |
| Tricuspid | RV failure, AV block, hepatic congestion | Optimize RV function; temporary pacing; gentle diuresis |
Anticoagulation for Prosthetic Valves
- Mechanical Aortic: INR 2.0–3.0 (add aspirin 75–100 mg)
- Mechanical Mitral: INR 2.5–3.5 (add aspirin 75–100 mg)
- Bioprosthetic: Aspirin ± warfarin first 3–6 months, then aspirin alone
- TAVR: Dual antiplatelet (aspirin + clopidogrel) × 3–6 months per institutional protocol
- Bridge Anticoagulation: Heparin infusion when INR subtherapeutic in high-risk mechanical valves
Durable LVAD Management
- Indications: Bridge to transplant (BTT), destination therapy (DT), bridge to candidacy/decision
- Flow Dynamics: Continuous-flow (CF) devices (HeartMate 3, HVAD); pulsatility index (PI) reflects native LV contribution
- Target Parameters: Flow 4–6 L/min, speed per device, PI 3–5 (HM3), power 4–7 W
- Suction Events: Low flow + low PI → hypovolemia, RV failure, tamponade, arrhythmia → volume, reduce speed, echo
- Pump Thrombosis: Rising power (HM3 >9 W), elevated LDH >2.5× ULN, dark urine → heparin, consider thrombolytics or device exchange
- Anticoagulation: Warfarin (INR 2.0–3.0) + aspirin 81–325 mg; bridge with heparin post-op
- RV Failure Post-LVAD: Occurs in 20–40%; preoperative predictors include elevated CVP, low PAPi, poor RV strain
S.K.
The World-Class Cardiac Intensivist
This content is for educational reference only. Always follow institutional protocols and exercise clinical judgment.